Casinos refused to give Phil Ivey what he had won. Instead of paying him, they sued him. I wrote about it today at The Federalist.
My Twitter advice to President-elect Donald Trump: delete your account. Read more at The Federalist.
I reviewed an old book about college that offers some new solutions. Check it out at The Federalist.
Today at The Federalist, I expanded on a theme I first touched on last year: moving federal jobs out of D.C. to share the prosperity with the rest of the country. Specifically, this new article suggests that Trump could begin to restore prosperity to the areas in the Midwest that voted for him by shifting jobs there. Read all about it.
On Friday, I wrote for Hardball Times about the men who have made the last out in a World Series. It’s a surprising group–take a look.
Today at The Federalist, I wrote about James Mattis and the restrictions on former officers serving as Secretary of Defense.
I’ve always enjoyed maps of things like “what if the 50 states were arranged in a different way?” This 2012 map, by Neil Freeman, is one of my favorites. The author imagines what the 50 states would look like if they were reorganized the way congressional districts are, each being equal in population. It also helps that the map is beautifully drawn, the sort of thing I just enjoy looking at.
Freeman drew his map with Electoral College reform in mind. If the states were all equal-sized by population, then lefty complaints about the Senate and the Electoral College would be eliminated. After the 2012 election, however, Nate Cohn pointed out in a New Republic article that a map with the states arranged in Freeman’s new pattern would have actually given the election to Mitt Romney, despite Obama’s commanding lead in the popular vote. As an electoral reform, then, the idea only made things worse. But as a piece of art and a thought experiment, it remains a success.
I had no such lofty goals, but I did wonder what my home commonwealth of Pennsylvania would look like with 67 equal-population counties. I drew it up here. This is not something I endorse as a political matter (although Philadelphia might do better as a group of smaller governmental units) but just a bit of fun. It also gives a visual representation of where Pennsylvania’s population is concentrated in a way many other maps don’t.
After posting that map of Philadelphia’s presidential votes the other day, I wanted to see how much had changed since 2012. So I came up with this:
You’re still looking at a vast sea of blue, but the differences jump out at you. Clinton and Obama both won the city easily, but Obama won it much more thoroughly. Trump won wide swathes of the 45th ward where Obama had carried every single division four years earlier. Trump’s victories in the Northeast were also much deeper and widespread. Even in the dark blue areas of North and West Philly, we can see that Obama was the stronger candidate. Where Clinton had three divisions with 100% of the votes for her, Obama had twenty-seven. The pattern held throughout the area. Clinton didn’t lose much of Obama’s totals, just a handful of votes in each division. But it was enough.
Today at The Federalist, I ask If The Clinton Foundation Was So Great, Why Aren’t Democrats Pushing Donations Now?